Design by Comparison
When we are designing, are we looking at our own constraints, resources, tools, etc? If yes, then why exactly? Can we look elsewhere first for inspiration? When we do, I feel that we often also find insights, ideas, as well as designs which work. These designs gives us insight into alternative approaches and methodologies. They at least show us broader, more effective ways of implementing various tools, products, and projects. Then we are able to apply what we've learned in terms of our own locality. Canada is at the greatest advantage in North America. Mammoth state projects must be initiated and overseen by Washington. We watch. Often not for too long. For the Americans are if anything swift. Once completed, we gather insights and corollaries about their success, and about their subsequent challenges. In Canada, our boon is our 'smaller frame' - we are small in comparison to the United States. Though greatly dispersed as well, revolutions in communications have enabled Canadians to be increasingly co-ordinated while remote and isolated. Plus, here in Ottawa, the levity is less. People stop by for stroll and treats. Out of this atmosphere comes devotion to collaboration and joint-enterprise. And these salient features are what sustains our public initiatives. They enforce a political climate, which ensures that Canadians can continue to participate in state-creation, as has been the tradition throughout some European, Scandinavian, and Nordic territories. Other ways are successful throughout the globe. But Canada's unique blend of traditions places it not within the mentioned cultures, but nearby. It does share methods of governing with specific regions and locales, but its cultural assemblage draws it back to its globally dynamic position of neutrality and leadership.
